*New*
 AOF Contamination report
 GM Canola Factsheet
 History of how Bayer Cropscience caused contamination of non-GM canola in Australia
 NCF submission released
 The drive behind GM Crops
 Letter to Prime Minister
 Invitation to endorse letter to PM
 Farmers prepare for legal fight over GM
 Crop management plans
 Liability paper - Duncan Currie
 GM Crops: Risks and Risk Management Required

1. Key issues
 Summary and Overview
 10 main NCF concerns
 Farmers misled
 Q & A for school projects
 What is the drive for GM crops?
 Links to other issues
 Scientific concerns summary
 The future - 2020?
 What is expected of non-GM growers in Canada
 Beyond the Bulldust
 *Unfair liability*
 Pressures in GM debate
 Questions regarding risk management
 Genetic engineering – a crop of hyperbole

2. GM crops banned
 Monsanto Crop Management & Resistance Management Plans
 Why Australia is not prepared for commercial trials
 Monsanto's GM Roundup Ready canola
 Bayer Cropscience's GM Invigor canola
 Where to now?
 State legislation - moratoria

3. Market issues
 Canola markets
 Zero tolerance of GM contamination is market demand
 Wheat will be impacted
 Higher prices for non-GM canola
 Contamination scare affects market
 Japanese requirements
 Consumer polls & market rejection
 Effects of GM contamination in canola
 EU will not tolerate acceptance of tolerance levels
 What our marketers say
 How and when non-GM premiums started

About us
 Network Policy & Objectives
 NCF Funding
 NCF History
 NCF profile: Julie Newman
 NCF profile: Juliet McFarlane
 Early work

Canola
 What is canola?
 Statistics - yields
 Canadian farmers nervous about GM canola acceptance in Japan
 Letter from Japan

Coexistence & Segregation
 Crop Management Plans for non-GM grower
 Farmer to farmer Hypothetical
 Segregation and coexistence plans
 Seed industry allows 0.5% contamination
 Canadian grain segregation
 Zero tolerance is market demand
 European coexistence report
 Identity preservation and segregation
 What is expected of non-GM growers in Canada
 Testing protocol
 Labels for GM contamination
 EU will not accept contamination
 Proposed Stewardship Program for Canola
 Contract harvester problems
 Crop management plans

Consumer concerns
 Is GM food safe?
 Churches - 10 reasons against GM
 Scientific concerns
 Cross Kingdom Breeding
 Food safety testing inadequate
 Environmental effects
 13 Science based reasons for GM-free
 Myths about the Digestion of Proteins and DNA
 5 part series covering issues
 Health Risk
 Reason for Schools to ban GM Foods
 Monsanto's feeding studies
 FSANZ answers regarding food testing
 Scientific report on safety testing
 Trespass report
 Scientific concerns
 Consumer concerns summary
 GM food lecture
 Monsanto
 Seeds of Concern
 Public attitudes to GM food
 Scrambling and gambling with the genome
 L-tryptophan - A Deadly Epidemic
 Protestors (photos)
 GM health concerns in brief
 Inadequate health testing for GM canola
 Russian study showing high death rates in offspring
 Pusztai debate
 Hidden uncertainties - risks of GMOs
 Study shows GM eating Americans sicker than non-GM eating English
 Scientists see spike in kids' food allergies
 Latest GMO Research: Decreased Fertility, Immunological Alterations and Allergies

Contamination
 Contamination is uncontrollable (photos)
 Gene transfer & cross-pollination
 GM product recalls
 Environmental contamination (photos)
 Confronting contamination & co-existence
 Invigor canola outcrossing
 Gene Stacking = Super Weed
 AOF contamination report
 History of how Bayer Cropscience caused contamination of non-GM canola in Australia

Corporate control
 Corporate control
 Corporate Engineering in Public Debate
 In (Seed) Bed Together
 Cartoon
 IP And Genetically Modified Organisms: A Fateful Combination

Costs and liabilities
 Costs to non-GM farmers
 Non-GM Liable for Contamination?
 Liability issues associated with GM crops - AFFA
 Supplying non-GM requires certification
 Liability questions answered
 More on liability
 *Farmer liability*
 Liability and GM crops

Economics
 No economic benefit for farmers
 Economic Recommendations
 Economic Critique
 Why has the OGTR ignored economics?
 Australian farmers can not afford GM crops
 What benefit?
 Higher plant yields better or worse for farmers?
 Effects of GM contamination in canola
 Global seed industry concentration
 Canada versus Australia comparison
 No farmer economic gain for pharmaceutical crops
 NCF: Economics of GM canola ***

Farmer attitudes
 Australian farmer surveys
 Farm lobby group policies
 Victorian ALP policy
 GCA farm lobby group policies

GM / Non-GM difference
 What is GM / Non-GM?
 GM plant breeding not faster
 Will the industry be in crisis without GM?
 Why GM is different

GM canola
 Will GM canola yield more in Australia?
 Comparison between Canadian and Australian canola conditions
 Are GM chemicals safer, cheaper or more efficient?
 How much GM canola is grown in Canada?
 Canadian and Australian canola statistics
 Economics of GM canola

GM crops
 Public good or corporate control?
 Misleading claims over GM
 ISAAA GM crop areas misleading
 Use of GM crops
 GM crops and chemical use
 Multiple spray applications vs yield penalty
 Yield problems - links
 GM cotton failures
 Global yields
 Pharmaceutical crops
 Global Trends in GM Crops
 Who benefits from GM crops?

GM crops experience
 Canadian Farmers viewpoint
 American farmers viewpoint
 American Corn Growers experience
 Argentina faces serious problems
 Report on North American Experience
 Canadian organic farmers
 Argentina & GM soy - success at what cost?
 How is industry managing non-GM now?
 India, Bulgaria, Indonesia
 Monsanto vs US farmers
 Global GM adoption
 US farmers warned of GM Liability
 Farming news links
 GM-growing US faces agricultural trade deficit
 GM soy in US not considered food grade
 Monsanto in Argentina
 GM soy war in Paraguay
 Violence in Brazil

GM wheat
 Learn more about GM wheat
 Marketing systems for GM wheat
 GM Wheat submission - food health
 Report - Farmers lose with GM wheat
 What our marketers say
 Canadian Wheat Board position

Honey issues
 Apiarist briefing
 The impact of GM contamination
 SA Apiarists briefing
 Map SA & Vic

How trustworthy is decision-making?
 Vested interests revealed
 Why trust the regulatory process?
 Sue Meek profile
 Federal government pro-GM
 Scientists influenced
 Liability, GCA and legal action
 Research manipulated
 OGTR does not assess economics, segregation, chemical resistance, food testing etc.
 Three faces of science fraud
 Misleading GM language

Insurance
 Insurance Council submission
 Insurance avoid GM risk

International Protocols
 World Trade Organisation
 Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
 Free Trade Agreement
 Farmers right to replant seeds
 International agreements
 GM labelling
 WTO ruling does not prevent countries from restricting or banning GMOs
 Biotechnology Policy Documents of FAO Members

Legal Issues
 Law
 Copy of Technology User Agreement
 2003 Monsanto contract
 GM Patents
 Monsanto shoot themselves in the foot (cartoon)
 Will law protect us from contamination?
 Summary of Supreme Court hearing of Percy Schmeiser
 NSW Minister guarantees farmers are protected
 AFFA-liability issues
 US farmers sued
 US farmers warned of GM liability issues
 GM Crops and farmers Liability
 Why is the non-GM grower liable for contamination?
 Innocent farmer sued
 Federal judge's opinion shows understanding of patented gene spread
 Liability for non-GM farmers
 More on liability:
 Liability and GM crops
 Farmers prepare for legal fight over GM
 Liability issues - Duncan Currie

Legislation & Regulation
 Trials vs Commercial Release
 Bayer Cropscience Invigor Canola approved by OGTR
 States impose moratoriums in role to protect economics
 OGTR role
 Gene Technology Act
 GM canola trial locations
 Victorian Moratorium
 Australian GM status by States
 Federal candidate views
 OGTR unapproved GM canola trials
 Gene Technology Act Critique
 South Australian Act
 WA proudly GM-free
 *State moratoria legislation*
 Gene Tech Act reviews denies compensation
 National Biotechnology Strategy
 Chronology of genetic engineering regulation in Australia: 1953–2008

Links
 Genome Scrambling Links
 Links
 Top 10 books on GM
 Religious links

Network action
 Invigor canola submission OGTR
 GM Zone proposal submissions
 GTGC submission summary
 NCF Newsletters
 NCF Media releases
 GTGC full submission
 Roundup Ready Submission OGTR
 Network tours
 pro-GM lobbyists attack NCF
 Pro-GM tantrums
 Advertisement
 Victorian farmer survey
 NCF banner & flyer
 Field day survey
 Community monitoring of GM Crop Trials
 Letters to farmers
 
 Gene Tech Act Review Pt1
 Gene Tech Act Reveiw Pt 2
 Gene Tech Act Review Pt3
 Bayer Protest
 Bayers Response to NCF

Organics
 Canadian organic standard
 American organic standards

Trials
 Victorian maps
 Victorian sites - photos
 SA trial photos
 Trials summary
 Topas 19/2 contamination
 South Australia 2006 GM Trials

 

Seeds of doubt - North American farmers' experiences of GE crops

About the report

Seeds of Doubt: North American farmers' experiences of GE crops is the first comprehensive study into the economic and social impacts of Genetically Engineered crops in North America. The 67 page report is fully referenced and includes economic analysis, agronomic data, and stories from farmers.

Overview of GM crops worldwide

  • GE crops were first grown commercially in 1996. Six years later, most countries are still not growing GE crops and they account for just 3% of broadacre crops globally.
  • Four countries account for 99% of the total area of GE crops (US, Canada, China and Argentina).
  • Four crops account for 99% of the total global GE acreage (Canola, Soy, Corn, Cotton). Only 19% of the total area planted to these crops in 2001 was GE.
  • One company, Monsanto, dominates the market, accounting for 91% of total GE crop area.
  • Of the GE crops that have been commercialised, only GE Soy is increasing in area.

Key findings of the report

Economic Impacts

  • Including subsidies, GE crops have cost the US economy at least $12 billion from 1999-2001. This has been due to contamination and loss of markets;
  • Within a few years of the introduction of GM crops, almost the entire US$300 million annual US maize exports to the EU and the $300 million annual Canadian rape (canola) exports to the EU had disappeared due to market rejection. The US share of the world soya market has decreased while non-GE producing countries have seen an increase;
  • The biggest single contamination problem was the Starlink corn debacle in which GE corn that was not approved for human consumption contaminated up to 50% of the total US corn supply (despite Starlink being only 1% of total corn area planted). Starlink was found in food products such as taco shells and the recall cost to Aventis was estimated to be up to $1 billion;
  • US farm subsidies were supposed to have fallen over the past few years. Instead, they rose dramatically, parallelling the growth in area of GE crops;
  • The profitability of growing GE herbicide tolerant soya and insect-resistant Bt maize is less than non-GE crops. This is due to the extra cost of GM seed (which can be up to 40% higher), the lower market prices paid for some GE crops, and reduced soya yields;
  • GE crops have caused widespread contamination and led to the elimination of the organic sector in some parts of North America. Many organic and other GE-free maize farmers have lost sales or received lower prices because of contamination. The cost of this is estimated at over $US 90 million annually;

Impacts on farmers

  • Farmers have not benefited but have suffered a severe reduction in choice about how they farm as a result of the introduction of GE crops. Some farmers are now finding themselves locked into growing GE crops as no GE-Free option remains. Non-GE seeds varieties are increasingly difficult to buy, and some conventional seed stocks are contaminated;
  • GE crops have led to a proliferation of legal issues over patents and lost markets. Biotechnology companies are suing many farmers for infringing company patent rights, saying that they have unlicensed GE plants on their land;
  • A non-GE farmer whose crop was contaminated by GMOs was sued by Monsanto for US$400,000. Farmers are turning to the courts for compensation for lost income and markets as a result of contamination;
  • Promises of increased yields from GE crops have generally not materialised. GE soya has yielded 11% less than high yielding non-GE soybeans, and 6% on average less overall;
  • The economic benefits to farmers have simply not materialised. Take up of the crops is related to heavy marketing, lack of alternative sources of information on crop performance and convenience for the farmer.

Environmental impacts

  • Contrary to claims from the biotechnology industry, farmers are also now more reliant on herbicides (weedkillers). Certain crops have been engineered to be resistant to specific herbicides to enable farmers to spray weeds without damaging crops. Although it was claimed that only one application would be needed per crop, several applications are often required;
  • Weeds are developing resistance to herbicides, and rogue GE plants that grow after a harvest (volunteers) have appeared and spread widely. This is particularly a problem with canola in Canada.

 

Selected quotes from the report

"Were it not for the…income support payments…that act as a kind of limited economic damage control system…farmers would be feeling a much greater economic impact from the export sales lost as a result of GMO's", Dan McGuire, policy chairman, American Corn Growers Association, March 2002.

"The application of biotechnology at present is most unlikely…not to increase maximum yields. More fundamental scientific breakthroughs are necessary if yields are to increase." United States Department of Agriculture, 2001 Agriculture Information Bulletin

"GM canola has, in fact, spread much more rapidly than we thought it would. It is absolutely impossible to control…It's been a great wake-up call about the side effects of these GM technologies." Professor Martin Entz, University of Manitoba, 2001.

About the Soil Association

The Soil Association is a membership charity which was founded in 1946 by a group of farmers, scientists and nutritionists who were concerned about the way food was produced. It is at the centre of the debate about sustainable farming policy in the UK and worldwide.

 

Seach the archive:  
or by date  

23 December 2008
W.A. Minister ignores Risk Management

07 November 2008
Rigged GM trials

29 October 2008
GM Crops: Risks and Risk Management Needed

25 September 2008
Concerns about 'onerous' clauses in GM crop contract

27 July 2008
Monsanto suspected of anticompetitive practises in US crop seed industry

19 June 2008
GM - a crop of hyperbole

17 June 2008
Monsanto scans for anti-GM blogs

15 June 2008
GM global news: early June

13 June 2008
GM Coexistence plans a failure

11 June 2008
Patent dispute may impact on GM future

News archive