*New*
 Rigged trials
 Legal Letter
 GM Crops: Risks and Risk Management Required
 Agronomics and Economics of GM Canola

1. Key issues
 Summary and Overview
 10 main NCF concerns
 Farmers misled
 Q & A for school projects
 What is the drive for GM crops?
 Links to other issues
 Scientific concerns summary
 The future - 2020?
 What is expected of non-GM growers in Canada
 Beyond the Bulldust
 *Unfair liability*
 Pressures in GM debate
 Questions regarding risk management
 Genetic engineering – a crop of hyperbole
 Agronomics and Economics of GM canola

2. GM crops banned
 Monsanto Crop Management & Resistance Management Plans
 Why Australia is not prepared for commercial trials
 Monsanto's GM Roundup Ready canola
 Bayer Cropscience's GM Invigor canola
 Where to now?
 State legislation - moratoria

3. Market issues
 Canola markets
 Zero tolerance of GM contamination is market demand
 Wheat will be impacted
 Higher prices for non-GM canola
 Contamination scare affects market
 Japanese requirements
 Consumer polls & market rejection
 Effects of GM contamination in canola
 EU will not tolerate acceptance of tolerance levels
 What our marketers say
 How and when non-GM premiums started

About us
 Network Policy & Objectives
 NCF Funding
 NCF History
 NCF profile: Julie Newman
 NCF profile: Juliet McFarlane
 Early work

Canola
 What is canola?
 Statistics - yields
 GM Canola Factsheet
 Canadian farmers nervous about GM canola acceptance in Japan
 Letter from Japan

Coexistence & Segregation
 Crop Management Plans for non-GM grower
 Farmer to farmer Hypothetical
 Segregation and coexistence plans
 Seed industry allows 0.5% contamination
 Canadian grain segregation
 Zero tolerance is market demand
 European coexistence report
 Identity preservation and segregation
 What is expected of non-GM growers in Canada
 Testing protocol
 Labels for GM contamination
 EU will not accept contamination
 Proposed Stewardship Program for Canola
 Contract harvester problems
 Crop management plans
 Industry avoids the truth about GM segregation

Consumer concerns
 Is GM food safe?
 Churches - 10 reasons against GM
 Scientific concerns
 Cross Kingdom Breeding
 Food safety testing inadequate
 Environmental effects
 13 Science based reasons for GM-free
 Myths about the Digestion of Proteins and DNA
 5 part series covering issues
 Health Risk
 Reason for Schools to ban GM Foods
 Monsanto's feeding studies
 FSANZ answers regarding food testing
 Scientific report on safety testing
 Trespass report
 Scientific concerns
 Consumer concerns summary
 GM food lecture
 Monsanto
 Seeds of Concern
 Public attitudes to GM food
 Scrambling and gambling with the genome
 L-tryptophan - A Deadly Epidemic
 Protestors (photos)
 GM health concerns in brief
 Inadequate health testing for GM canola
 Russian study showing high death rates in offspring
 Pusztai debate
 Hidden uncertainties - risks of GMOs
 Study shows GM eating Americans sicker than non-GM eating English
 Scientists see spike in kids' food allergies
 Latest GMO Research: Decreased Fertility, Immunological Alterations and Allergies
 Key health papers of concern
 Do we really know what we are doing?

Contamination
 Contamination is uncontrollable (photos)
 Gene transfer & cross-pollination
 GM product recalls
 Environmental contamination (photos)
 Confronting contamination & co-existence
 Invigor canola outcrossing
 Gene Stacking = Super Weed
 AOF contamination report
 History of how Bayer Cropscience caused contamination of non-GM canola in Australia
 Fighting GMO contamination around the world

Corporate control
 Corporate control
 Corporate Engineering in Public Debate
 Commercial influence on science
 In (Seed) Bed Together
 The drive behind GM Crops
 Cartoon
 IP And Genetically Modified Organisms: A Fateful Combination
 Commercial influence on science
 Made by Monsanto

Costs and liabilities
 Costs to non-GM farmers
 Non-GM Liable for Contamination?
 Liability issues associated with GM crops - AFFA
 Supplying non-GM requires certification
 Liability questions answered
 More on liability
 *Farmer liability*
 Liability and GM crops

Economics
 No economic benefit for farmers
 Economic Recommendations
 Economic Critique
 Why has the OGTR ignored economics?
 Australian farmers can not afford GM crops
 What benefit?
 Higher plant yields better or worse for farmers?
 Effects of GM contamination in canola
 Global seed industry concentration
 Canada versus Australia comparison
 No farmer economic gain for pharmaceutical crops
 NCF: Economics of GM canola ***
 Agronomics and Economics of GM Canola

Farmer attitudes
 Australian farmer surveys
 Farm lobby group policies
 Victorian ALP policy
 GCA farm lobby group policies

GM / Non-GM difference
 What is GM / Non-GM?
 GM plant breeding not faster
 Will the industry be in crisis without GM?
 Why GM is different
 Non-GM biotech is the future

GM canola
 Will GM canola yield more in Australia?
 Comparison between Canadian and Australian canola conditions
 Are GM chemicals safer, cheaper or more efficient?
 How much GM canola is grown in Canada?
 Canadian and Australian canola statistics
 Economics of GM canola

GM crops
 Public good or corporate control?
 Misleading claims over GM
 ISAAA GM crop areas misleading
 Use of GM crops
 GM crops and chemical use
 Multiple spray applications vs yield penalty
 Yield problems - links
 GM cotton failures
 Global yields
 Pharmaceutical crops
 Global Trends in GM Crops
 Who benefits from GM crops?

GM crops experience
 Canadian Farmers viewpoint
 American farmers viewpoint
 American Corn Growers experience
 Argentina faces serious problems
 Report on North American Experience
 Canadian organic farmers
 Argentina & GM soy - success at what cost?
 How is industry managing non-GM now?
 India, Bulgaria, Indonesia
 Monsanto vs US farmers
 Global GM adoption
 US farmers warned of GM Liability
 Farming news links
 GM-growing US faces agricultural trade deficit
 GM soy in US not considered food grade
 Monsanto in Argentina
 GM soy war in Paraguay
 Violence in Brazil
 12 Years of GM soya in Argentina - disaster for people and environment

GM wheat
 Learn more about GM wheat
 Marketing systems for GM wheat
 GM Wheat submission - food health
 Report - Farmers lose with GM wheat
 What our marketers say
 Canadian Wheat Board position
 GM Wheat impossible to segregate

Honey issues
 Apiarist briefing
 The impact of GM contamination
 SA Apiarists briefing
 Map SA & Vic
 Honey tests reveal GM contamination

How trustworthy is decision-making?
 Vested interests revealed
 Why trust the regulatory process?
 Sue Meek profile
 Federal government pro-GM
 Scientists influenced
 Liability, GCA and legal action
 Research manipulated
 OGTR does not assess economics, segregation, chemical resistance, food testing etc.
 Three faces of science fraud
 Misleading GM language

Insurance
 Insurance Council submission
 Insurance avoid GM risk

International Protocols
 World Trade Organisation
 Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
 Free Trade Agreement
 Farmers right to replant seeds
 International agreements
 GM labelling
 WTO ruling does not prevent countries from restricting or banning GMOs
 Biotechnology Policy Documents of FAO Members

Legal Issues
 Law
 Copy of Technology User Agreement
 2003 Monsanto contract
 GM Patents
 Monsanto shoot themselves in the foot (cartoon)
 Will law protect us from contamination?
 Summary of Supreme Court hearing of Percy Schmeiser
 NSW Minister guarantees farmers are protected
 AFFA-liability issues
 US farmers sued
 US farmers warned of GM liability issues
 GM Crops and farmers Liability
 Why is the non-GM grower liable for contamination?
 Innocent farmer sued
 Federal judge's opinion shows understanding of patented gene spread
 Liability for non-GM farmers
 More on liability:
 Liability and GM crops
 Farmers prepare for legal fight over GM
 Legal letter from non-GM to GM
 Liability issues - Duncan Currie

Legislation & Regulation
 Trials vs Commercial Release
 Bayer Cropscience Invigor Canola approved by OGTR
 States impose moratoriums in role to protect economics
 OGTR role
 Gene Technology Act
 GM canola trial locations
 Victorian Moratorium
 Australian GM status by States
 Federal candidate views
 OGTR unapproved GM canola trials
 Gene Technology Act Critique
 South Australian Act
 WA proudly GM-free
 *State moratoria legislation*
 Gene Tech Act reviews denies compensation
 National Biotechnology Strategy
 Chronology of genetic engineering regulation in Australia: 1953–2008

Links
 Genome Scrambling Links
 Links
 Top 10 books on GM
 Religious links

Network action
 Invigor canola submission OGTR
 GM Zone proposal submissions
 GTGC submission summary
 NCF Newsletters
 NCF Media releases
 GTGC full submission
 Roundup Ready Submission OGTR
 Network tours
 pro-GM lobbyists attack NCF
 Pro-GM tantrums
 Advertisement
 Victorian farmer survey
 NCF banner & flyer
 Field day survey
 Community monitoring of GM Crop Trials
 Letters to farmers
 
 Gene Tech Act Review Pt1
 Gene Tech Act Reveiw Pt 2
 Gene Tech Act Review Pt3
 Bayer Protest
 Bayers Response to NCF
 NCF submission released

Organics
 Canadian organic standard
 American organic standards

Trials
 Victorian maps
 Victorian sites - photos
 SA trial photos
 Trials summary
 Topas 19/2 contamination
 South Australia 2006 GM Trials

 

20 August 2003

Farmer to farmer Hypothetical

Will coexistance work?
When we try to put into practise what is supposed to work in theory, we have a few serious problems.
Although the following letters appear ridiculous, they have factual basis throughout and could be anticipated as what to expect in "neighbour to neighbour cooperation" following the proposed coexistance plans. Hopefully it explains why there is such concern by non-GM growers.

Dear non-GM neighbour,
I noticed you have planted canola next to mine and I am letting you know that my crop is GM canola and you have to follow a few "industry" decided rules so that we can co-exist.

I need to know if you are growing your canola for seed again because we have to work out who will have a 400 metre buffer zone if you are, otherwise there is no mention of a buffer zone for normal crops. It is not compulsory for us to follow the rules with buffer zones but it is recommended and I plan on doing things properly.

There is no policing or penalty regarding buffer zones, and an industry committee called the GTGC has decided it will be left up to us neighbours to sort out between ourselves. There was talk of a 5 metre buffer zone but when it was obvious that this was meant to be in the non-GM growers paddock some farmers kicked up about it and it was changed to the GM growers side. It doesn’t look like they have a need for any buffer zones now.

I hope you are not growing your GM crop for seed again as I don't really think I should be providing a 400 metre buffer zone if you are. Neither of us want to do that but as a GM grower, I will not be affected if I refuse to follow the crop management plans, but you, the non-GM grower will be because you will have to prove you are non-GM.

If you grow seed for replanting, the experts think a 400 metre buffer zone is the best or you will be replanting contaminated seed and will have to market as GM.

But don’t worry, if you market your seed as GM and buy seed every year, you will not have to worry about this but I have to tell you your options.

Regards and best wishes, GM grower

Dear GM neighbour,

What the heck are you talking about? I don’t want to market as GM and I shouldn’t have to worry about getting contaminated, you are growing GM and you should be keeping control of it.

I grow my own seed and have done for years, I have no intention of changing anything. You know a buffer zone will not work, why should I have to prove I don‘t have contamination?

Regards, Non-GM neighbour

Dear Non-GM neighbour,

It’s not my fault. The industry has decided that we all market as GM but you can still have a choice if you want to market as non-GM and grow your own seed.

The idea is that because you can't get a quarantine certificate to say your canola is guaranteed non-GM, you have to prove it. You have to prove that you have done all you can to stop contamination and it means a whole lot of bookwork, checklists and keeping samples.

It is easier if you just market as GM and buy new seed every year.

If not, it is a lot of rigmarole.

You had better book in to a quality assurance program because it is compulsory if you want to sell as non-GM. I have to do it too and almost fell over when I found it costs a few thousand with a $500/year audit fee. You have to keep the samples because if contamination is found anywhere along the supply chain, you will have these samples tested and you will be liable if it is found that you caused the contamination. You will not know if you are contaminated until there is a problem because those low level tests cost about $800 each and take 3 days to do. It might be worth you checking your insurance for this because it might mean you are liable for a rejection of a shipment or a recall of a product worth millions, but I did hear that insurance was not possible.

Apparently the total identity preservation, segregation and traceability system costs about 20% of your canola value (10% if you can take contamination up to 1%) so it's probably not worth you growing canola at all if you don‘t want to market as GM.

Oh I almost forgot to tell you... You shouldn’t keep growing your own crop for seed, you have to buy certified seed every second year but every year if you aren't quality assured. You might have trouble getting anyone to grade your canola for seed anyway because apparently no seed cleaners want to deal with canola because of the liability. It is a shame that seed does not stay viable for long or you would be able to buy all your certified non-GM seed that you ever need now. Canada has just found that 95% of their certified seed is contaminated and more than half is contaminated beyond certification standards and many with multiple resistances. It will be interesting to find out where Australia will grow their certified non-GM seed because some Canadians are using 2km buffer zones now.

You just have to realise, it’s not worth you worrying about growing your own seed or marketing as non-GM.

Regards, GM neighbour.

Dear GM neighbour,

Surely you understand, I do want to market as non-GM and I don’t want any contamination. If you contaminate my crop, you have to be responsible for it.

Non-GM neighbour

Dear Non-GM neighbour,

I can’t control contamination and you know it! We all know that any buffer zone will not stop my GM canola going into yours but you have to expect some contamination. The "experts" said that 1% is OK though but there is a bit of debate about that.

Pollen can travel for about 3km and can last for days on animals like our resident kangaroos and cockies in that area but that’s is the least of our problems.

You are on the wind side of my crop and will probably get some of my swaths going into your paddock anyway. Hopefully winds will never be as bad as the winds last harvest where I heard you didn't have any canola left to harvest because it blew away. You should know more than anyone that the crop is so vulnerable when it is cut into swaths, the wind can pick it up and take it for miles. I know you will not like my new header with the spreader because it will toss my GM canola stubble complete with seed about 20 metres.

Get over it, you will get contamination, it is best that you market as GM from now on, markets should be OK.

GM neighbour.

Dear GM neighbour,

I have no intention of marketing on a market consumers do not want.

I have been checking and 1% is not really anything to do with markets it is to do with labelling of some food GM which does not even cover canola oil. We can't even sell into Europe with 1%. The GM industry used 1% as a guideline to convince government, farmers and the public that coexistence was possible.

I found if we sell a product as "non-GM" it must have no contamination in it (same as non smoking means no smoking). Markets want guarantees of no contamination.

We need a zero tolerance of contamination in half of our wheat export volume, and some lupin and barley markets want the same. I heard that the dairy, pork, beef and yabbies need a zero contamination in the grain we sell them and even honey, hay and clover needs a zero tolerance of GM canola.

I hear our storage and handler now wants a guarantee of no contamination and you have to sign an indemnity to say you will not blame them if they cause any contamination (like the WA 2003 CBH documents).

I mean it, you keep your GM crop out of mine.

Non-GM grower.

Dear Non-GM grower,

OK if you want to be like that, this is what you do. I think we should decide that if you want to keep replant your crop for seed you provide the buffer strip and you have 2 choices. You can either plow in 400 metres of your crop that is close to the fenceline, (which is not a good option) or you must treat the first 400 metres of your canola crop as GM.

This means you have to swath and harvest this separately and keep the seed entirely separate all the way through the supply chain. You must have it stored, transported and sold as GM and be responsible for making sure none of this seed is spilt along the way. You then have to completely clean out your header, augers, trucks, silos etc before you move on to your non-GM crop. Some contract harvesters said it would take about 2 days to clean the harvester properly. My wife had a little laugh when I told her what you had to do, she said to say good luck and you can borrow the vacuum cleaner.
When you finish harvest and want to graze your sheep on this canola stubble, you must build a holding pen in your paddock and have to contain them for 7-10 days before you move them. You might have to clean out the manure during this time because otherwise you might find that you will spread some GM seed around your property or even to someone else’s if you sell your stock and the seed is stuck in their feet or wool. There will probably be a clause you have to sign on a sale contract to say your sheep have been grazing on GM though and you might not be able to sell your sheep to some places. You will have to buy some hay because you don't usually pen up your stock and don't forget to order a sheep trough and tank because you will have to put some water into the holding pen. It is funny really, you would think you would have to pen up all the wild animals too because you seem to have as many kangaroos and birds on your canola paddock as you have sheep.
We know about 10% of the canola crop falls on the ground at harvest and can germinate for years later. Whenever you plant a crop in that section for the next few years, you have to clean all your gear down before you move on to the rest of the crop. I think that means you have to scrub all the points with a scrubbing brush, but not really sure. It would be easier and cheaper for you to fence off 400 metres of your boundary.

Either way, it is your responsibility to keep an eye out for any canola that you think is GM and spray it whenever you see some volunteers pop up as they flower all year round. You are meant to ring either Bayer Cropscience or Monsanto and they can tell you what to spray it with and I think they register you so they can check if you have controlled contamination.

I am going to plant Roundup Ready so you will have to start using Sprayseed as a pre-emergent and 2,4-D in your post emergent mix. Be careful you don't kill your newly planted trees though because we all know what damage 2,4-D does to the trees.

You will be pleased to know that this rigmarole has been very well regulated and should keep contamination under 1% in the first year. That is using Canadian experiences but I suppose without the snow to control volunteers and of course with our sheep to spread it around, it will be quite a bit worse in Australia.

I keep trying to tell you that it is best that you don’t grow your own seed or sell as non-GM. I think it is wrong that you are taking this so personally.

Regards, GM neighbour.

To GM neighbour,

How ridiculous!! Of course we are angry, what do you expect? We have no intention of going through that ridiculous rigmarole.

I read the article in the paper today where Japan has said they will pay premiums for non-GM now and do not want to buy anything that is GM as they have enough of that from Canada. Some mills are dedicating themselves to produce non-GM canola oil only and we have to guarantee we have no contamination. China and European Union wants a guarantee of no GM as they are labelling canola oil now. Why should I compensate the GM industry for taking less for my product?

I hear our marketers are pressuring the handlers to bring in grading at outurn soon so that they can get rid of the GM canola out of the wheat, barley and lupins because so many of their markets will not take any trace of GM canola. It is estimated at $5-10/tonne and will cost me about $50,000 extra. Why should I compensate the GM industry by paying extra costs?

If I market as non-GM, who is going to pay me for my land if I fence off 400 metres around my boundary? That amounts to hundreds of acres!!! Why should I compensate the GM industry by giving away my land?

We have just been told that the shire were grizzling and threatening to put up the rates because they have been told that they have to spray all the roads now and they are looking for someone to take on the contract full time now. They are worried about the trees on the side of the road dying from 2,4-D too. Why should ratepayers compensate the GM industry?

There are some stories going around that Australia will follow the rest of the world's example and crops will be policed for GM by the Oilseeds Federation (Monsanto and Bayer Cropscience are members) under a committee called the Canola Reference Group. They have even got funding for our government to do this where in other countries the GM industry has to pay for this. If GM is found where it is not meant to be then we might have to go to court. Apparently GM varieties are different to non-GM because they have a major patent instead of a minor patent and the GM product provider owns the rights to the seed and all its offsprings. There is no law to say how much contamination is illegal but at worst I go to court and pay the entire profit of my crop and the legal fees. Some guy called Nelson was innocent and it cost him a fortune to fight it and years to prove the samples were taken from someone elses land. Some farmers have been threatened and found it less fuss and cheaper to pay the Biotech company the royalty fees if they threatened them but these fees are about the same as leasing someone elses land. If you stop growing GM canola after this year, you will not be able to keep it out of non-GM canola.

We are being told we will not be sued but I have just found out why. Monsanto has a deal where they can deduct their user fee out of our payments for canola if they detect any contamination. Why should I compensate the GM industry?

I mean it, keep your GM crop out of mine.

From your Non-GM neighbour.

To Non-GM neighbour,

You should not have told your son he can no longer sell yabbies for pocket money just because we grow GM. Tell your son not to bully my son over this and my wife is still upset over how rude your wife was to her in front of the school. It's a small town, we have to get on.

It's not our fault you know, we were all told not to worry about markets because if consumers can't buy uncontaminated product, they will have to accept contamination eventually. Now consumers are saying they don’t want to buy canola oil at all because they are buying other oils that are not GM.

It is not all easy for us either you know. I have been told that I can’t sell my sheep if they are on a property with GM and can’t even get freight for them after our crop sets seed so have to sell them now before harvest.

My wife warned me that you might not be too happy about this but our industry leaders said you have to expect a bit of a change in your farming practises in the interests of good science and we were all told Biotechnology is going to bring great advances. It is funny that I asked for a variety that used the genomics and marker genes that we were told were so great in the biotechnology promotions. I thought they were talking about GM but apparently they could be achieved in non-GM after all. Even the yield benefits for Bayer Cropscience Invigor Canola did not explain very well that the extra yield was from hybrid breeding which can be done in non-GM anyway. The main GM bit is the chemical resistance which can be done in non-GM too (like Triazine Tolerant canola), our weeds are getting resistant to chemicals so it shouldn't be too hard to make canola resistant to it using conventional breeding.

My crop doesn’t look as good as yours anyway so it doesn’t look like I am going to be a winner after all. They didn't explain that there is a yield drag and that GM doesn't perform well at all if you don't have an ideal season. I wish there was some independent comparisons that I could have seen before I introduced it. When I complained, I was told that if I looked at the Monsanto website I would have seen that best of the Roundup Ready yielded 17% less than the Australian average canola crop so I should have expected it. I should have checked the figures properly. The government is saying they warned us because the Productivity Commission said yield benefits only averaged 1% with no significant reduction of costs. These figures from Canada are a little misleading as Canada has a 3 month shorter growing season so you would think they would benefit more from no delays with pre-emergent spraying.

Have you seen the Monsanto contract? It is a real worry for us farmers, I did not realise what was involved but I had committed myself to growing it before I looked at it.

I just thought I would give GM a whirl to see how it went, I didn’t expect all these problems.

Your GM neighbour.

Officially To GM neighbour,
I was on the misunderstanding that we would not be affected if you were to grow the crop of your choice and can not understand how these plans were supported by our farm industry representatives and supposed democratic governments.
After drawing up budget alternatives, I found it was a far cheaper option to employ a lawyer full time to protect my rights as a conventional non-GM farmer wanting the right to continue to farm as we have always farmed.
I would like to officially inform you that I am planning to grow and market non-GM canola and according to the Trade Practises Act, my produce must contain no GM seed. My lawyer will be in touch with you as soon as any contamination is found within my boundary and legal action will be pursued under the same law as you claimed when my spray drift killed a section of your crop. You should check with your insurance company as I doubt if you can get the same coverage for GM contamination as I had for spraydrift because contamination is known to be uncontrollable.
In my lawyers spare time, he is investigating the possibility of a class action against the government and the farm industry representatives under "duty of care" and "due diligence". Or even claims for compensation or resorting to subsidies like other countries but I can't see the tax payer liking that, can you?

It is a shame our long term friendships have to resort to this and I regret not having other alternatives.
Disappointingly yours,
Your non-GM neighbour

——————————————————————————

Reference:
Canola Stewardship Protocols/ Principles prepared by Avcare and awaiting endorsement by the Gene Technology Grains Committee who have expressed no concern for the non-GM grower. http://www.avcare.org.au/default.asp?V_DOC_ID=887


Crop Management Plans prepared by the GM industry under authority granted by Plant Industries Committee. Bayer Cropscience extract only: http://www.non-gm-farmers.com/news_details.asp?ID=312
Office of the Gene Technology Regulator Risk Management Strategy http://www.ogtr.gov.au/ir/rarmp.htm#final
*note: all Crop Management Plans and Resistance Management Plans for Bayer Cropscience and Monsanto were granted confidentiality until the crops are in the ground. Update: Monsanto has released plans http://www.non-gm-farmers.com/news_details.asp?ID=1033 

These plans are expected to be approved by government and industry soon: The Canola Stewardship Protocols/Principles were drafted by the GM product provider for approval by the Gene Technology Grains Committee. It was initiated and membership invitations extended by AVCARE, which represents the chemical companies producing GM canola. Even though 25% of this committee consists of the Biotech company themselves and many others had vested interests in the technology, you, the conventional non-GM farmer or your representative, was never invited nor allowed to attend meetings to discuss allocation of costs and liabilities. This committee decided that the non-GM grower would be the best to manage contamination in order to promote the GM product. In effect, the GM industry has been granted permission to self-manage the introduction of their crops.

WE CAN NOT ALLOW THIS ISSUE TO BE LEFT TO FARMER vs FARMER. We must address these problems prior to introduction as the process is irreversible.

A preferred option would be to ensure there is legislation to enforce the requirement for the GM industry to be totally responsible for their product and all costs and liabilities arising from contamination.

If not, there are serious legal issues (here) that if not addressed will result in legal actions against decision makers.

Julie Newman, Network of Concerned Farmers.

Latest Update: 20th March, 2004 

Print Version
 

Seach the archive:  
or by date  

09 November 2009
Industry avoid the truth about GM segregation problems

11 June 2009
Dupont alleges anti-competitive conduct by Monsanto

24 February 2009
Non-GM Farmers to pay for unwanted GM contamination

02 February 2009
Made by Monsanto

01 February 2009
Top 10 Seed and Pesticide companies

29 January 2009
Agronomics and Economics of GM Canola

29 January 2009
Non-GM biotech is the future

26 January 2009
12 Yrs of GM soya in Argentina - disaster for people and environment

19 January 2009
Non-GM seed preferred by farmers but difficult to obtain

16 January 2009
GM Canola a flop

News archive